March 21, 2007
TIME
The other day we got an offer in the mail for a subscription to
Time magazine. We cancelled that rag years ago, but I was wooed by the free clock/radio/thermometer they were giving away with the subscription. My mental dialog went like this: I really want that radio, and it's only $20, but then that means I'm saddled with
Time. Weighing, weighing. In the end, I decided to do without the radio because I couldn't bear the thought of giving more money to that stupid magazine. Unfortunately, Annika has a free subscription, so she's reduced to tossing her
Time when it gets
unfreakinreadable.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:52 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
In the past few weeks, Time has mailed me two free issues trying to get me to subscribe. Mind you, I am a volunteer with a soldier support organization, and I subscribe to a whole bunch of magazines that I am not interested in just so I can mail them in my care packages. However, after seeing the covers (the first was something offensive about Iraq, the second insinuated that Cheney was guilty of--something, who knows what), I threw the magazines away. I will NOT send that drivel to deployed troops.
Posted by: Pat in MN at March 21, 2007 10:14 AM (aUYIZ)
2
When I got my first apartment, one of the first things I did was subscribe to Time because in my mind, all grown ups had one such subscription.
Now I realize that if I really do need a Time subscription to be a grown up, I guess I don't really need to be a grown up.
Posted by: airforcewife at March 22, 2007 03:20 PM (0dU3f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 20, 2007
WORTH THE EFFORT
I don't know who out there will take my advice and read this blog, but hopefully at least one of you will. I have just sat here for an hour and a half catching up on
the neo-neocon's forty-year journey. Is someone out there interested in doing the same? You'll have to set aside time, for you'll need lots of it, but the journey is far worth the effort. Imagine you're reading a book instead of a blog! Grab coffee or cocoa and get comfy. Hit the link, scroll to the bottom, and begin the still-unfolding journey from Vietnam protester to neocon.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:58 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Have it marked and plan on spending my day off there. I too have made such a journey...felt much vindicated when I read Michael Medved's "Right Turns".
Posted by: Mary*Ann at March 22, 2007 06:32 PM (bdvqO)
2
I've read it. Neo-neo's blog is excellent for when you're in that kind of mood.
Fortunately, I was raised by parents who were Conservative and Libertarian respectively, so I was spared that kind of excess nonsense in my upbringing.
Posted by: hydralisk at March 26, 2007 09:36 AM (C5NoR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
STEADY DIET OF INSANE
You know, there's a lot of disturbing crap on LGF. But after reading it for years, I've grown fairly numb to the shock value. Psycho Muslims, absurd protests, Jews are pigs and apes, yeah yeah yeah, every day. But this one, this one was too much for me to take.
Protesters in Oregon burned a soldier in effigy.
So let's counter that display of evil with a huge display of hope: Kurdistan is getting a mall. And a Hilton. These photos will take your breath away.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:25 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yep. Don't you wish you lived here too? It's so sad. Our recruiters here have one of the hardest jobs in the Army, and the attitudes we put up with aren't exactly easy on their families either. I miss living in a military community much more than I ever thought I would.
Posted by: jen d at March 21, 2007 11:24 AM (GFXQl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 19, 2007
OH THE THINGS YOU CAN KNIT...
I'm already nesting for a baby that doesn't even exist yet. How's that for tuning in to my maternal spirit? But motherhood is also a handy excuse for new knitting patterns. Here's what I've been working on for the past two weeks:

The wombat looks highly ridiculous, but I just wanted mine to be the only kid on the block with a handmade wombat. The rhino is actually pretty cool, I think.
I plan to crowd the kid's crib with these things. Next up: an octopus and a snake.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:10 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
too cute! poor kid is going to live in a zoo . . . LOL!
Posted by: heidi at March 20, 2007 04:18 AM (E0L31)
2
I wish I had thought of crotcheting (I don't know how to knit) a wombat.
I did crochet a hippo in a ballet dress for one of them, though.
Posted by: airforcewife at March 20, 2007 09:34 AM (0dU3f)
3
Those are so cute! Even if I manage to learn to knit, I don't know that I'd ever be able to do anything quite so creative!
Posted by: Robin at March 20, 2007 12:55 PM (QKOEJ)
4
I like pigs!! haha They go well with rhinos and wombats
Posted by: Jennifer at March 22, 2007 03:07 AM (wrlJD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 17, 2007
WHEW
We just got back from seeing
300. It was beautiful. And the line was all the way out the sidewalk and around the corner...not bad for a Saturday at 1:00. I hope they're making a ton of money.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
HOW CAN WE KNOW WHAT IS SO?
I watched James Cameron's
The Lost Tomb of Jesus the other day, and I found myself fairly convinced by what I was hearing. But at the same time, something nagging in the back of my mind made me feel like I was being led down the garden path. I was taken in by the statistical data presented, thinking that it seemed more than just coincidental. But then I read
this article in Scientific American called "Has James Cameron Found Jesus's Tomb or Is It Just a Statistical Error?", and now I don't know what to think.
I don't really have a dog in this race. Whether or not those are really Jesus' bones has no effect on how I have chosen to live my life and what kind of person I want to be. I just want to know the truth and not be manipulated.
The problem with documentaries is that the documentarian always has something he wants his viewers to see. The process is inherently manipulative. James Cameron thinks they're Jesus' bones, so he will present evidence that supports that conclusion. Similarly, Al Gore thinks man is causing global warming, and Michael Moore thinks George Bush is evi, so they present evidence of the sort. But I know for a fact that someone could make a documentary showing that dogs are vicious, dangerous beasts. String together footage of snarling pit bulls, stories of children who've been mauled by dogs, and a reenactment of the time my neighbor's yellow lab bit me in the butt cheek, and a documentarian could convince someone who's never been around dogs that they're nasty creatures. That doesn't necessarily make it so.
I don't care if the ossuary belonged to the Jesus or not; I'm not sure what would change if we ever could figure it out, and I don't even really think we can figure it out. The inscription doesn't say Jesus The Messiah, The Guy We Were All Talking About In The Bible with a stick figure being crucified, so it's not so easy to be sure. But I also don't want someone to use math to manipulate me.
Math is too precious to be cheapened that way. Come to think of it, so are Jesus' bones.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 2 kb.
1
well it all comes down to whether you believe in the supernatural.
Posted by: John Ryan at March 27, 2007 05:15 AM (TcoRJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 15, 2007
CONFERENCE
Registration is underway for the Milblogs Conference! If you are planning to attend, please make sure you
go register!
Posted by: Sarah at
07:04 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I sure do wish I could go. It sounds really interesting. The timing just isn't right though. Maybe next year.
Posted by: Robin at March 15, 2007 02:28 PM (V5aG3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 14, 2007
FOR ME?
Did somebody out there buy us a really nice gift? We received a copy of
America's Secret War: Inside the Hidden Worldwide Struggle Between America and its Enemies in the mail today, and neither my husband nor I ordered it. And there's no receipt inside the package, so I can't even figure out if it was supposed to go to some other Amazon buyer or something. Anyway, it seemed blog-related, so I wanted to check and make sure none of you sent me a special gift while I try to track down who really was supposed to get this book.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:32 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 104 words, total size 1 kb.
March 13, 2007
SHE GROKS
If you haven't seen Pamela Hess' interview yet, you must devote nine minutes to
watching this video. She's a reporter who went to Iraq to figure out how our servicemembers could possibly have such high morale. She never expected the lesson she learned.
Now she groks.
It is this understanding she's gleaned from Iraq that drives my husband and others to yearn to return to Iraq. My husband will most likely be deploying next year, and that's not soon enough for him: he asked me if he could volunteer to go this fall instead. He aches to go back before it's too late, before there's a drawdown or before President Clinton yanks us out of there. He feels like he's running out of time to get back there and help, and it's killing him. I told him that I understand, but that he's slated for language training and he would be a whole lot more useful if he did that first before he deployed.
(Ha -- People kept telling me there's no 100% safe time to have a baby in the Army; my husband's trying to purposely deploy during the nine months we've set aside. Our breeding plans aren't safe from his convictions!)
Pamela Hess managed to grok what fuels our troops. Let's spread her story.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:34 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 1 kb.
1
ewwwww! Don't say "President Clinton"...it makes my skin crawl!!
Posted by: Angie at March 13, 2007 06:39 AM (4DpOk)
2
Being a C-span junkie I saw this live, the whole thing. I was touched and felt priviliged to have been watching. She is real.
Posted by: Ruth H at March 13, 2007 10:34 AM (c54X3)
3
OMG...I have found a kindred spirit in the "I cry when I am impressed with someone's human spirit" affliction. I even learned something watching that...I mean, she conveyed something that I didn't really understand completely and I feel smarter for having watched that.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at March 13, 2007 12:58 PM (deur4)
4
I know exactly what you mean. Even while hubby was deployed it was always, "When I deploy again..." It was never "if".
Sometimes I think he might believe the fate of the entire war and the free world rests on his upholding his end of the effort in-theater.
It's very bittersweet.
Posted by: airforcewife at March 14, 2007 10:05 AM (0dU3f)
5
I understand what you mean. I am in the RI Guard and wengt for OIF I. Just transferred to a unit that returned in OCT 2+2 = I probably wont get back to the sand box and though my family cant understand it, I'd like to go back, like your husband "before its too late".
Posted by: majham at March 16, 2007 08:50 AM (5ap+X)
6
Most Americans want the troops home.
Posted by: John Ryan at March 27, 2007 05:16 AM (TcoRJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 12, 2007
March 11, 2007
JUST...WOW
You can't imagine how disappointed and frustrated I feel after hearing what happened to AirForceWife:
Another Reason Not to Trust the Media
Posted by: Sarah at
04:31 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
wow, I wonder if they'll actually air that show?
Posted by: Angie at March 12, 2007 08:16 AM (4DpOk)
2
THANK YOU SO SO MUCH FOR POSTING THIS. It is schocking that Montel did this considering he was a Marine once. We are going into our first deployment so I am trying to take in as much as I can.
Posted by: Annie at March 16, 2007 04:53 PM (YadGF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 10, 2007
300
If you're already excited about the release of the movie
300, or if you don't know what the heck it is, you should read
Victor Davis Hanson's review of the movie. Me, I'm excited. We haven't seen a movie in the theater since Superman returned, but we might have to make an exception for this one.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:17 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We saw it last night. AMAZING movie. Equal to Braveheart in emotional impact and creation of the desire for courage and valor. And excellent dialog.
There was one scene in particular where the audience went nuts and applauded and cheered. And at the end it got a very loud ovation.
You won't regret seeing it.
Posted by: airforcewife at March 11, 2007 03:25 AM (0dU3f)
2
Ditto airforcewife, except the audience part, I live in a blue state.
I NEVER go to the movies, but I had to see these one.
Go. See. This.Movie!
Posted by: tim at March 12, 2007 03:21 AM (nno0f)
3
I went to go see this movie, however I found it too "shallow" and simplistic, but I loved the whole idea of paralleling it with America and the war on terrorism (I didn't read VDH's piece, but I assume that is what is suggested). The only thing that troubled me though is that this movie can be watched by anyone and seen basically as this call of "never give up and fight to the end, even if your position is futile and your countrymen don't agree with your POV." Okay, fine and dandy for us...but any jihadi watching this movie would nod their head in agreement too.
The whole time I was thinking...wow, this is such a propaganda film for the pro-war contigent of the war on terror. But today I spoke with someone at work, who had seen the movie and mentioned that, and he said...oh, yeah, now that you mention it, I guess it was, but otherwise I would have never thought so.
I loved the Queen's speech to the senators though...fabulous! We need Laura do make such a speech...however it only made sense 'cos the King was leading the troops. We need some Generals' wives to make speeches.
And there is nothing better than watching that movie surrounded by America's warrior class: about half the cinema or more were soldiers from the local Army base...it was pretty hooah!
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at March 12, 2007 12:40 PM (deur4)
4
Didn't the folks who did "sin city" do this? It looks cartoonish and computer enhanced. It doesn't appeal to me.
Posted by: Tom at March 13, 2007 03:56 AM (YuwDy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 08, 2007
HOOAH
Two good links I found on JackArmy:
First, some dorks tried to call recruiters and trick them into being so desperate as to let gays or druggies into the Army. Didn't work.
Second, a medic wrote about his reasons for joining the Army:
I digress a little, but people say only the bottom of the barrel go to the military but I definitely don't think that's true. A lot of my friends from college have joined because college life just wasn't for them and they're all smart kids (none of us scored lower than 99 on the ASVAB). I went to college for awhile myself, but both ran out of money (College is expensive!) and decided that it was far too dumbed down and ... hands-off to be enjoyable. I wasn't satisfied with half-sleeping in a classroom while the professor rambled on about stuff I didn't care at all about just so in 4 years I could take my $100,000 debt and get a reasonable job (which a college degree doesn't even guarantee these days). Some of us just want to do something that matters. Being a college student hardly accomplished anything -- I'd rather be out there fighting for something that shows results. Saving people from gunshot wounds, giving people gunshot wounds or leading others to do the same.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:46 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 222 words, total size 1 kb.
THEY WILL BE FUN
Lileks on
parenting:
We stood in the driveway and hacked at the ice with our heels until a yard of rubble cluttered the pavement. I thought of this today while listening to a Medved show about a WaPo piece on marriage; seems only the well-off can marry these days, and the poor decline the opportunity. A caller – male, age 31 – noted how he didn’t want to marry, and didn’t want kids, because they would ruin his freedom. Medved gently pointed out how things change, and gave the fellow a useful piece of news: kids are fun. You never consider that when you’re fancy-free and unburdened with diaper-filling squall-o-matic obligation units, but they’re fun, in ways you can never predict. You fill your day with all sorts of important tasks, but in the end nothing beats standing in the drive way in the wan March light, laughing and cracking the ice. That's the stuff you remember on your deathbed, I'll bet. That's the stuff you remember when you leave the building and strap on the wings.
I made a baby blanket. Now we just have to make the baby.
But I've found a new motto: If at first you don't succeed, drink boatloads of margaritas for 5-7 days and try again.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:34 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 1 kb.
March 07, 2007
GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE
I've really become a big Neal Boortz fan, and his remarks about how
the problems at Walter Reed will be everyone's problems if we have government health care hit home with me. We in the military have this government health care, and we truly understand the meaning of the phrase "you get what you pay for." I have never had any truly bad experiences with our health care system, but even the day-to-day dealings are what we'd all face under a nationalized plan. It takes at least six weeks to get a doctor's appointment, for anything whatsoever. And when it takes that long, it doesn't pay to be picky about which doctor you see, so I've never seen the same doctor more than once...except for the one in Germany whom everyone hated so her schedule was always open. It also routinely takes over an hour of waiting in line to get prescriptions filled. And records are constantly getting lost. It took me two months to request records from my hometown doctor, and then once the records finally arrived, you guess it, six weeks to get an appointment.
Boortz is right: this is what we'd all do if we had government health care. Yeah, we in the military don't pay for it, but when you don't pay, you also have no grounds to complain about being treated poorly.
MORE TO GROK:
JackArmy has great thoughts on the matter.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:39 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I agree that a nationalized health care plan is a bad idea, maybe for several reasons but surely for the reasons you cited. Working in a civilian hospital definitely causes me to look at the differences on a daily basis and sometimes leaves me disappointed in the Army healthcare. However, the most troublesome aspect of this whole Walter Reed dabacle is the fact that military members DO pay for their healthcare. I've seen recruitment salary quotes with the healthcare incentive factored in...making $40,000/year look like $60,000 and so forth. It's one of the ways the Army can make staying in the Army (especially for certain ranks) at least comparable to civilian careers.
Posted by: Nicole at March 07, 2007 05:07 AM (Mk6ZZ)
Posted by: Nicole at March 07, 2007 05:09 AM (Mk6ZZ)
3
Which is a big part of the reason hubby and I spent 3000$ of our own money three times to do home births rather than rely on military healthcare.
Posted by: airforcewife at March 07, 2007 07:07 AM (0dU3f)
4
“Yeah, we in the military don't pay for it, but when you don't pay, you also have no grounds to complain about being treated poorly.”
Your husband is in the Army, he pays for it. It may not come out of his paycheck, but he pays for it. Same with the guy who gets his leg blown off in Iraq, or gets shot in Afghanistan or breaks his leg at Camp Pendleton, etc, etcÂ…
Military health care should be the best this country has to offer and maybe more people need to complain about it till it is.
Dismount soapbox.
Posted by: tim at March 07, 2007 07:43 AM (nno0f)
5
A government-moving toward privatization-with Republicans from top to bottom, does a poor job of serving its citizens and its people.
What an astonishing conclusion on your part!
Posted by: John at March 07, 2007 12:33 PM (v4s/2)
6
This is a tough one. Don't forget that not long ago, the plan was to close Walter Reed. When you're going to close a facility, you stop spending money on it.
IMO, the Army medical system is a victim of its own success. A war or two ago, many of our soldiers would not have survived their wounds let alone make it to Walter Reed.
I guess the point I wanted to make was that the military is composed of humans; making human mistakes. I used to think the Army hospitals were terrible until I had surgery in a civilian one. I've met some of the best and worst doctors/dentists in the Army. I should tell you my dentist story; he could pull my teeth anytime.
Posted by: R1 at March 07, 2007 05:51 PM (xexA1)
7
I agree, R1: my dentist in Germany was the best and I wish I could keep him forever. I don't think the quality of personnel suffers as much as the desire to make the patient happy. Soldiers think nothing of waiting in line for an hour, so why speed things up? And a broken down section of Walter Reed was most likely a step UP from whatever these folks were living in in Iraq. I think that leaves little incentive for improvement.
Posted by: Sarah at March 08, 2007 02:25 AM (vrR+j)
8
If our government shouldn't pay for the health care of our wounded, then what in the hell should it pay for?
Maybe commercials about how much we support the troops?
Posted by: John at March 08, 2007 05:43 PM (8h7sz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 05, 2007
SAVE THE UGLIES
You should go check out this
photo slideshow of ugly endangered animals. It was a very interesting commentary on the conservation movement. Plus, I think that jerboa is kinda cute. But what do I know; I'm a girl who hates dolphins.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:38 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Now how can you hate dolphins? They taste just like tuna!
Posted by: Ted at March 05, 2007 11:49 AM (+OVgL)
2
I'm your mother, and I'm surprised that you don't like dolphins? Why? Did they scare you when you fed them off the coast of Florida?
Mama
Posted by: Nancy at March 06, 2007 08:17 AM (b3nH9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MMMMMM
This should get your mouth watered up for
Lileks today:
Beware people who regard the distinctions between public and private as a mere legality, and one based on subjective viewpoint at that. In the end, they can define anything private as public, which gives them the right to take it away. And if you lose something you own, well, “loss” is a subjective concept as well that does not match real life. Or at least the real life you can understand if you have a whole new mind.
And if that doesn't make you want to click the link, this will:
It’s a safe bet that people who use the words “empowered,” “community” and “meaningful” in close proximity do not produce anything you can hold in your hands.
It isn't quite Notes from the Olive Garden, but it's definitely good squishy.
And here comes the heart attack, because I just tried to link to the Olive Garden screed and found that it is gone. Panic sets in. Lilek's main page says the screeds will be reposted in 03/07. Whew. OK, I suppose I can give him some time to rearrange.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:46 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 192 words, total size 1 kb.
March 04, 2007
DESKMERC, THIS ONE'S FOR YOU
Found this via
SciencePunk:

Yeah, I didn't get it either until I went to the original website, and now I can't stop thinking that this is the coolest thing I've ever seen. Romantic Math is awesome.
Oh, and I totally want this clock.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:52 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
NEAT NEAT NEAT
(rummages around for disk of Mathematica)
I'll get back to you on this one.
Posted by: Deskmerc at March 04, 2007 03:46 PM (obWV/)
2
Thanks for the mention! Although I think the
clock on my site is much better, as it can magically improve your stereo.
Posted by: Frank at March 05, 2007 07:58 AM (ywDyB)
3
Too cool! ...and I thought my binary clock was something.
Posted by: Vonn at March 05, 2007 05:42 PM (/VoEr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 03, 2007
LINK
The new Victor Davis Hanson:
Anatomy of Iraq. Excerpt:
There were numerous reasons to remove Saddam — 23, according to the Congress that authorized the war — but the administration privileged just one, the sensible fear of weapons of mass destruction. That was legitimate and understandable, and would prove effective so long as either a postwar weapons-trove turned up or the war and its aftermath finished without a hitch.
Unfortunately neither proved to be the case. So with that prime rationale discredited, the partisan Congress suddenly reinvented itself in protesting that it had really voted for war on only one cause, not 23. And when the news and evidence both went bad, that lone reason was now pronounced null and void and hardly a basis for war.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:48 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.
March 02, 2007
LOOKING FOR COMPANIONSHIP?
Anyone in Texas want to adopt
two truly beautful dogs?
(No,
Erin, not you. You already have four.)
Posted by: Sarah at
10:35 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
THANK YOU!!!!! Kobe & Kalli are still looking for a forever home and I truly appreciate you mentioning it here.
Posted by: Mare at March 02, 2007 06:14 PM (Oc90P)
2
Haha. They are beautiful, though.
Hey, I have four minutes left on my lunch break. I just wanted to say hi. I haven't had any time to comment on the rest of your posts, but I've been reading. And I miss you.
Posted by: Erin at March 03, 2007 10:23 AM (XRza7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
87kb generated in CPU 0.1052, elapsed 0.2057 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.1836 seconds, 272 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.